Ure Museum Database



Browse
There are 67 objects for which Condition contains → no
14.9.12 Paint wearing off from topside. Large chip to surface of underside - perhpas caused by an air bubble. Evidence of charring (?) on underside. No finished edges. 2005.88.0002.jpg
14.9.24 Colour in good condition and the surface has no significant deposit or damage. 2007.03.1270.jpg
14.9.28 No finished edges allowing the inclusions in the clay to be seen. Brown deposits on the outside. 2007.03.1273.jpg
14.9.44 Small areas of pink deposit. The outer ripples appear somewhat blurred. No damage to rim. 2003.01.0099.jpg
14.9.7 No finished edges. The paint on the interior surface remains clearer and in better condition than the exterior. Spots of deposit on the exterior surface too. 2007.03.1255.jpg
14.9.8 Paint is dull and wearing away on both sides. Surface is smooth with no particular damage.
2003.7.15 Intact, paint shows little signs of fading, no chips or scratches. 2007.03.1222.jpg
2007.10.2.209 The head has been worn away - no detail left.
2008.7.111 Fragment; badly worn and chipped, decoration barely visible; "O.N" or "N.O" handwritten in pencil on interior.
2008.9.111 Fairly good; plastic shelves are no longer on their supports.
2008.9.115 Fairly good; some of the model objects have lost their supports and are no longer attached to the model.
2008.9.118c Very good; basket no longer attached to rest of model, some bits of foam coming detached.
23.11.31F Slightly chipped. Half of the front leg is broken off, and the spear no longer remains. 2003.96.0001.jpg
23.11.31L Fragmented, cracked, and chipped, with no clear defining features except shield. Brownish-grey colour. 2005.06.0077.jpg
26.2.26 Underside has slight patches of discolouration and bands are starting to fade. The topside has lost the white decoration so that only traces remain. No surface damage or deposit. 2013.04.0061.jpg
26.2.28 Painted bands on underside are wearing away considerably compared to the topside which has retained most of its colour apart from some white but it is now a little dull. Surfaces are all still smooth with no significant damage. 2003.45.0081.jpg
28.6.6 Damage to one handle almost breaking the circle. Complete handle has deposits (perhaps from burial). Paint is very worn and in most places only staining remains. For such a fragile rim it is in excellent condition with no chips. 2003.97.0123.jpg
34.10.23 Comprised of one large piece and three small pieces at the bottom, which have been rejoined. Missing the left foot and lower left portion of the figurine (previously restored or reattached: traces of glue and modern white plaster remain. Almost no traces of colour remain, except red on some of the head. White surface covered with grayish-tan deposits. Chipped on the back of the top of the head. 2002.97.0419.jpg
38.4.3 Complete, appears intact. Paint extremely faded. Inside of mouth has over three small chips. There is one noticeable chip on the outside of the lip. The paint on the neck appears to have been worn away, because a pinkish clay is showing which does not appear to be a fading of the black decoration. There are at least two hairline cracks on the shoulder, with some of the clay worn away. The handles are in good condition with no noticeable chips, whereas the body has several chips and cracks. The base has a few small chips but is in very good condition. 2003.01.0004.jpg
45.6.2 Intact and no significant chips to rim, handles, base or body. 2003.97.0209.jpg
47.2.15 Complete, no chips, paint quite faded. The inside surface is worn. 2008.99.0110.jpg
48.5.1 Intact. Pattern inside remains clear but some of the main pictures have faded badly (especially C). No significant damage to rims or handles. 2010.98.0115.jpg
50.12.16 Good, no chips, decoration slightly faded. 2003.98.0164.jpg
50.4.4 Comprised of four fragments, rejoined. Gray adhesions on the surface, much gray and white flaking off from inside and outside. No other traces of colour remain. 2004.07.0007.jpg
62.10.1 Complete and intact. Small chips on rim, decoration faded and worn on rim, mouth, handles, and parts of the decoration on the body. No lid. 2008.98.0333.jpg
65.6.2 Broken off at the shoulders; small white deposit at fracture. Highly polished with no surface damage. The scratches caused through production are still visible.
73.9.23 The surface of the fragment appears to be in fairly good condition, except for a few small areas of grey deposit. The back of the fragment varies in colour, moving from red to black and then grey. The surface however is again in fairly good condition with no real evidence of wear except for a few small scratches. 2002.97.0191.jpg
73.9.8 Two fragments. (a)The glaze on the rim and the inside of the fragment shows a few small scratches. On the rim and the outside of the fragment there are a few small areas of milky/white deposit. The black blob reveals an area which may have been the base of a handle. The colour of the clay inside here, is a more pink colour. Like the first fragment, fragment (b) shows evidence of small scratches on the glaze, both inside and out, but seems in fairly good condition, with no evidence of deposit. 2002.97.0185.jpg
E.23.13 No discernable damage
E.23.29 appears to have no restoration or recent damage. The pottery is very rough with innumerable shallow chips, and there is a large amount of white deposit all over the object, a particularly large patch can be found near the base. 2007.01.0076.jpg
E.23.45 Serious rusting means the loop on the hinge no longer moves nor do the tweezer arms. The colour is red and brown and the surface is uneven and rough.
E.23.49.1 Intact no discernable damage or deposit. 2002.98.0138.jpg
E.23.49.2 Intact, no damage but some brown deposit around the edges on the top side. 2002.98.0139.jpg
E.23.49.3 Intact, no discernable damage or deposit 2002.98.0131.jpg
E.23.49.5 Intact, no discernable damage or deposit. 2002.98.0145.jpg
E.23.5 Intact, if it did have ivory handle it is no longer there. There is a small amount of brown deposit around the edges of the artefact. 2008.08.0270.jpg
E.23.6 Intact, no deposit or significant damage. 2002.98.0135.jpg
E.23.7 Intact, no deposit or discernable damage 2002.98.0150.jpg
E.23.8 Intact, no discernable damage or deposit. 2002.98.0133.jpg
E.62.17 Intact and complete. The details are still clear and there is no obvious damage to the artefact. 2002.98.0982.jpg
E.62.2 Intact if fragmentary. The detail is refined and there is no deposit on the surphace. No discernable damage. 2008.08.0210.jpg
E.62.23 Single corner fragment chipped in the triangular shaped hieroglyph. No significant wear on the relief. 2008.08.0144.jpg
E.62.3 Single fragment. The image is complete except for the large chip in the head of the worshipper. There is also Red pigment remaining on his body. The bottom left of the fragment has no image and is speckled with a grey deposit. 2002.98.0246.jpg
E.62.5 Intact, with no apparent damage to surface.
E.62.54 Not whole, stuck back together from two pieces, resulting in a large crack. The lip is also stuck back together from three pieces. Little or no deposit. 2002.98.0018.jpg
E.62.55 Intact and complete, there is no damage aside from some imperfections on the base. There is also a few areas of black deposit on the inside of the vase. 2002.98.0151.jpg
E.62.60 Intact. No major chips or dents (except one dent near the base which is a result of bad workmanship or is designed to allow the pot), very little deposit. The decoration is still very clear. 2002.98.0028.jpg
E.63.1 Fragmentary but intact. There are no major cracks, but there is a large amount of muddy deposit all over the artefact. 2002.98.0163.jpg
E.63.12 Intact and complete. Although much of the glaze is gone there is no loss of detail nor any deposit. 2008.08.0207.jpg
E.63.9 Intact and complete, the glaze is still present although the light green colour is somewhat faded. Aside from one crack and two small chips on the facade no detail has been lost. 2002.98.0219.jpg
E.65.15 Intact if fragmentary, no colour is lost although the surface is rough in some areas suggesting a loss in glaze, one end displays characteristics of having been snapped of a larger object. 2002.98.0969.jpg
E.65.16 Intact and complete, the glaze has gone abd there is no more painted detail. There are areas of white deposit all over the artefact. 2002.98.0933.jpg
L.2011.1.47 Fragmentary, chipped, no edge and coated in grey sediment 2011.96.0074.jpg
L.2016.3.16 Intact, no discernible damage.
L.2016.3.17 Intact, no discernible damage. Minimal white deposits around the ending edge (of the long sides).
L.2016.3.18 Intact, no discernible damage.
L.2016.3.19 Intact, no discernible damage.
L.2016.3.20 Intact, no discernible damage.
L.2016.3.21 Intact, no discernible damage.
L.2016.3.22 Intact, no discernible damage.
L.2016.3.23 Intact, no discernible damage.
REDMG:1935.87.12 Good amount of colour remains. No lid preserved. 2003.97.0182.jpg
REDMG:1935.87.14 No lid preserved. Small hole in body and slight chips in base. 2003.06.0094.jpg
REDMG:1935.87.35 Incomplete. Only head remains, no body. Lots of detail on both face and head, but both are marred by whitish deposit. Detail at tip of the head has broken off.
REDMG:1964.1683.1 Fragment in good condition with no chips or scratches. Only very small deposits can be seen in the rim. 2006.20.0525.jpg
REDMG:1964.1690.1 Paint rubbed off. Rim has no chips in. 2006.20.0523.jpg
REDMG:1964.1719.1 Over half of the object is missing, but the half that remains is in good condition with no significant damage. Some deposits have collected in base. 2006.20.0107.jpg
The Ure Museum is part of
The University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 217, Reading, RG6 6AH